We Use Cookies

    We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, analyze site traffic, and personalize content. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies. You can customize your preferences or reject non-essential cookies.

    Learn more about our cookie policy
    Models · Anthropic · Sonnet

    Claude Sonnet 5.5 is live on AI·Collab

    Anthropic's fastest Sonnet yet: 30%+ faster than Sonnet 5, dramatically stronger at agentic coding, near-Opus knowledge work — with a 1M-token context window, ZDR routing and native tools on AI·Collab.

    Model selection
    ≈ 8 min read
    30%+ faster
    ZDR
    AGENTIC

    A practical frontier model for everyday work

    Anthropic released Claude Sonnet 5.5 on September 28, 2026. It is a clear upgrade over Sonnet 5, aimed at well-scoped everyday tasks: fixing bugs, iterating quickly, producing polished documents, presentations and spreadsheets, and working with visual material. It is also a much stronger coding agent. The largest published jump is Terminal-Bench 4.0, where Sonnet 5.5 scores 70.6% compared with 10.3% for Sonnet 5. Anthropic positions Opus 5.5 above it for complex, open-ended work requiring sustained judgment; Sonnet 5.5 is the faster, lower-cost complement.

    On AI·Collab, search for “Claude Sonnet 5.5”. The regular model is live as PAID, ZDR and AGENTIC, with native tool calling, knowledge-base access and a 1M-token context window.

    Faster output, fewer steps, lower task cost

    Sonnet 5.5 keeps Sonnet 5's $2 input / $10 output price per million tokens, but Anthropic reports that it typically needs fewer tokens and fewer tool steps to complete the same work. In their testing, that reduced cost per task by up to 30%. External testers also report 14% fewer output tokens at Slack, one-third fewer tool calls at Lovable, and support tickets processed 20% faster at Zendesk.

    30%+

    faster generation than Sonnet 5

    up to 30%

    lower cost per completed task

    1M

    tokens of context on AI·Collab

    Published benchmark results

    The official benchmark table shows broad gains over Sonnet 5. At maximum effort, some results approach Opus 5.5, but Anthropic is explicit that Opus remains stronger for ambiguous, open-ended work. Benchmark results are useful signals, not guarantees for every workload.

    Official Anthropic benchmark table comparing Claude Sonnet 5.5, Sonnet 5, Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Sol across Terminal-Bench, FrontierCode, CursorBench, GDPval-AA, AA-Briefcase, Humanity's Last Exam, OSWorld and Chartography.
    Claude Sonnet 5.5 benchmark comparison. Source: Anthropic, September 28, 2026.

    Terminal-Bench 4.0 — 70.6%

    A dramatic rise from Sonnet 5's 10.3%, and above the reported Opus 5.5 score of 66.4%. This benchmark measures complex multi-step professional work in a terminal.

    CursorBench 4.0 — 55.5%

    Up from 34.1% for Sonnet 5 and within 2.3 points of Opus 5.5 at 57.8%. CursorBench uses ambiguous, multi-file tasks from real coding sessions.

    GDPval-AA v2.1 — 1844

    Nearly level with Opus 5.5 at 1846 and well ahead of Sonnet 5 at 1449. AA-Briefcase shows a similar pattern: 1811 versus 1822 for Opus 5.5.

    OSWorld 80.1% · Chartography 61.6%

    Computer use rises from 57.0% to 80.1%; visual chart recognition rises from 15.6% to 61.6%, supporting document, screenshot and chart-heavy workflows.

    Anthropic chart plotting Terminal-Bench 4.0 accuracy against cost per attempt for Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5, Sonnet 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol across effort levels.
    Terminal-Bench 4.0 accuracy versus cost per attempt. Anthropic says Sonnet 5.5 at Medium effort exceeds Sonnet 5's best score for less than one tenth of the task cost.

    Benchmark table and chart © Anthropic, captured from the official Sonnet 5.5 announcement and reproduced for editorial reference.

    Where Sonnet 5.5 fits

    The model is optimized for fast collaboration rather than maximum deliberation. That makes it a strong default when tasks are clear, iteration speed matters and you still need frontier-level quality.

    Coding and debugging

    Fast codebase understanding, bug fixing, reviews and multi-file implementation. Early testers report fewer failed tool calls and less prescriptive prompting.

    Knowledge work

    Strong document drafting, analysis, support workflows and slide creation. Anthropic reports results close to Opus 5.5 on real occupational tasks.

    Visual and design work

    Improved image and chart understanding, polished UI generation and better adherence to presentation templates.

    Agentic tools

    Native function calling is verified on AI·Collab. Use it with memories, knowledge bases, notes and other tools for focused multi-step workflows.

    ZDR on AI·Collab — with stronger safeguards

    The regular OpenRouter model is currently labelled ZDR in the AI·Collab catalogue. AI·Collab routes it through the standard privacy-controlled model path; always use the live model card as the authoritative source because provider routing and labels can change.

    Anthropic says Sonnet 5.5 is the first Sonnet to launch with cyber safeguards comparable to its most capable models, plus biology safeguards and protections against reasoning extraction. These target a narrow set of high-risk requests; ordinary software development and most life-sciences work are unaffected.

    How to use Sonnet 5.5 on AI·Collab

    The model is available now in the regular catalogue — no EU preview route is required.

    1

    Add it to My Custom Models

    Open Account Settings → My Custom Models and add Claude Sonnet 5.5.

    2

    Pick it for fast, scoped work

    Use it for debugging, code review, document creation, charts and iterative tasks. For the hardest open-ended problems, compare it with Fable 5.1 or Opus-class models.

    3

    Check the live model card

    The catalogue shows the current price, context window, ZDR status and availability. Those live values take precedence over launch-day copy.

    Verified AI·Collab rate at launch: 2,428 input credits and 12,144 output credits per 1M tokens. Upstream list price: $2 input / $10 output; cache reads $0.20; cache writes $2.50.

    Frequently asked questions

    How is Sonnet 5.5 different from Sonnet 5?

    It is more than a speed refresh. Anthropic reports 30%+ faster output, much higher agentic-coding scores, better knowledge work, stronger image/chart understanding and fewer tokens or tool steps for many tasks. Token list pricing remains $2 / $10 per million input/output tokens.

    Should I use Sonnet 5.5 or Fable 5.1?

    Use Sonnet 5.5 for fast, well-scoped everyday coding and knowledge work. Use Fable 5.1 when a long, difficult, open-ended agent run justifies higher cost and its NON-ZDR retention policy is acceptable. The live catalogue shows current labels and prices.

    Is Sonnet 5.5 ZDR on AI·Collab?

    Yes, the regular model is currently labelled ZDR in the AI·Collab catalogue. This is distinct from the separate OpenRouter EU preview. Always confirm the current label on the live model card before sensitive work.

    Does Sonnet 5.5 support tools and knowledge bases?

    Yes. AI·Collab has verified native function calling for anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5, and the model is marked AGENTIC. It can use AI·Collab tools such as memories and knowledge bases when enabled.

    What does Sonnet 5.5 cost on AI·Collab?

    At launch the verified rate is 2,428 input credits and 12,144 output credits per million tokens. Anthropic's upstream list price is $2 / $10. Consult the models page for the current live rate.

    What is the context window?

    The live AI·Collab catalogue reports a 1,000,000-token context window for Claude Sonnet 5.5.

    Benchmark and third-party customer figures are reported by Anthropic in its September 28, 2026 announcement and have not been independently verified by AI·Collab. Images are © Anthropic and reproduced for editorial reference. Prices, context limits and privacy labels can change; the live model catalogue is authoritative.

    Related Articles

    Ready to Experience 300+ AI Models?

    Get started today. Access models from OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, Grok and more.

    GDPR compliant · Zero data retention · Cancel anytime